The SCW Q&A: Flare-ups, Milton in Houston, land vs. sea, temps vs. storm, old-school maps.

We’re cutting it so close to the end of the month that it’s … scary! 👻 But here’s October’s SCW Q&A post, just in the nick of time! As usual, Eric and Matt address a wide variety of topics from the solar flares and the damage they do; to the damage a Hurricane Milton-type storm might do locally; to classic weather maps with front lines … and more!

Got a question for next month’s entry? Drop it in the comments below, in the Contact link above, or on social media at […takes long breath…] Facebook, X, Threads, Instagram, Mastadon or Bluesky.


Q. Whenever there’s a solar flare big enough to push the Northern Lights as far south as Texas, I always read that they can also disrupt communications and even affect power lines. But I have never seen reports of that actually happening. Are there any instances of flares disrupting these things?

A. I recently wrote about solar storms for Ars Technica, so I’m familiar with the issue. Just to recap: solar storms are triggered when the Sun ejects a significant amount of its magnetic field and plasma into the solar wind. When these coronal mass ejections reach Earth’s magnetic field, they change it and can introduce significant currents into electricity lines and transformers, leading to damage or outages.

NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory images of a solar flare – as seen in the bright flash on the right of each image – on Feb. 16, 2024. (NASA/SDO)

The solar storms we’ve been seeing of late, earlier this month and back in May, were very strong, rated G5 or ‘extreme’ on the most commonly used scale. There have been some modest effects, such as on satellites. But by and large, our planet’s strong magnetic field has shielded us from the worst. The sobering thing to think about is that these recent storms, although strong, are far from the strongest storms imaginable. The most intense geomagnetic storm on record occurred in 1859, during the so-called Carrington Event. If such an event were to happen today, it likely would be rather damaging to our power and telecommunications systems. But just how damaging? We really don’t know for sure.

– Eric

Q. After seeing Hurricanes Beryl, Helene and Milton and seeing all the damage, what would have happened if we had been hit by Helene or Milton? I live on the border of Bellaire and Houston and love living here. I am seriously considering moving.

Hurricane Milton approaching Florida, as seen from NOAA’s GOES-16 satellite at 6:30 p.m. EDT on October 8, 2024. (Image credit: NOAA)

A. What would happen? Bad things. It really depends on where a storm makes landfall, but for the purposes of this question let’s say the storm makes landfall at San Luis Pass (the southern end of Galveston Island), perpendicular to the coast. We’ll focus on Helene, since it was stronger at landfall (140 mph sustained winds). This is what I consider to be a realistic worst-case scenario for the Houston region as it puts a significant storm surge into Galveston Island and Galveston Bay, potentially also pushing a large surge into the extensive chemical facilities along the Houston Ship Channel. This is an environmental disaster waiting to happen.

Worse, however, would be the winds. Such a track and landfall intensity would put a majority of the greater Houston area under Category 1 to 2 winds (approximately 40 mph higher than experienced during Beryl). This would likely knock out electricity not for days, or weeks, but rather months for some people. Damage to roofs and structures would be catastrophic, likely exceeding $200 billion. The long-term consequences of the power outages, future insurance costs, and damage would likely forever alter our community. Sorry for going so negative, but a powerful Category 4 hurricane striking Galveston Island and moving into Houston is exactly the kind of storm that keeps me up at night. I very much hope to never live to see it.

– Eric

Q: I have been astounded by the sheer volume of, for lack of a better term, hurricane denial following Hurricane Milton. Aside from the weather control/manipulation “preposteria,” there has been a great deal of discussion of Milton being a lesser storm at landfall (Cat 1 or tropical storm) than the 120-mph Cat 3 figure given by the National Hurricane Center. The basis for this claim is focused upon observed sustained wind values on land as the storm moved inland. With a storm like Milton, what are reasonable expectations of observed wind speeds given the 120mph max sustained values at landfall? How does the interaction with land affect observations? How do observed values in other storms correlate with NHC figures?

A: This is a great question, and it’s a great opportunity for education. In terms of “weather manipulation,” we’ve already addressed how this is simply not possible to do with a hurricane. So I won’t dwell on that. But there is a huge, huge misconception on hurricanes and wind speed.

Land affects wind speed. Because there’s so much “stuff” on land (trees, buildings, rocks, dirt, etc.) there is friction to slow the wind down. Compare running your hand over the surface of a bathtub to a surface of sidewalk concrete. There’s a difference there. Wind will slow down significantly over land than water. So when you have hurricane hunters measuring the intensity of a storm over water, they’re getting what is basically a “true” capture of what’s happening because the surface winds are dramatically less impeded by friction when they’re over the ocean surface. But every hurricane will have lower wind than that on land. With every storm, we have people, even meteorologists complaining that no one observed wind on land at the levels the NHC said the storm was at. Scientifically, that’s what is supposed to happen! It’s not always easy to explain to people though. Some even say it’s “their” way of hyping up a storm.

Every so often a storm will be able to mix down stronger winds over land, something that is dependent on a number of things. We probably saw this with Beryl here in Houston where we had 80 mph wind gusts make it well inland. That doesn’t mean that Beryl was a category 2 storm at landfall (that will be assessed in the postseason), but it was a case where the measured intensity of the storm over water matched what was observed over land as well.

Map of the NWS Wind Risk outlook from Milton showing hurricane force winds (red and purple) and tropical storm force winds (yellow and orange). (NOAA NWS)

There’s a broader point to be made here that would qualify the Saffir-Simpson scale for hurricanes as an antiquated way of measuring a storm’s true intensity and power. But the simpler point here is that measuring wind is hard, and the system we have now is what it is. So now you know: Friction is usually your friend.

–Matt

Q: Does the surface temperature over land have any effect on how quickly a hurricane/tropical storm abates? Nighttime temperatures fell to the mid-40’s in Asheville, NC. If it had been that cold on September 26-27, would the storm damage have been less severe to any significant extent?

A: Simply put, the answer is that it has little impact. If a hurricane is coming, the circulation ahead of it will almost always usher in warm, humid air concurrent with the heavy rain and stronger winds. In this case, Helene approached from the south and tracked just southwest of Asheville. Because of this, winds were out of the southeast ahead of the storm, which tapped into much warmer and humid air. Had Helene tracked 250 miles east of where it did, winds in Asheville would have been out of the north and it would have been much cooler and less humid. Basically, the track of the hurricane helps dictate the temperature, but the intensity of the hurricane is unlikely to be impacted in any way by the actual land temperature.

Now, land can impact a hurricane via the brown ocean effect. Essentially that’s when the ground is either so saturated ahead of a storm or so much rain falls in front of the hurricane that it acts more like a shallow body of water than land. It also needs to be warm. In that case, a tropical storm’s intensity can ebb more slowly or in some cases it can even maintain intensity. It’s unlikely that happened during Helene, but we have seen that in other storms before. This was most notable during 2007’s Tropical Storm Erin in Oklahoma and north Texas.

–Matt

Q. Love your reporting. Just curious, is there a map that shows where fronts are on the map and their path? I see it on tv weather all the time and with all the talk about fronts pushing through, I was just curious the best way to see those fronts on a map.

A national forecast map for Tuesday, October 29, with frontal boundaries. (National Weather Service)

A. The best such map available online comes courtesy of the National Weather Service, and it is updated daily during the pre-dawn hours. Here’s a direct link to the national map, and here’s the overview page. Note that if you click on the “animated forecast maps” link from this second page you can see a seven-day forecast that includes fronts. Enjoy!

–Eric

The SCW Q&A: Heading inland, hurricanes vs. winter, AI models, pool evaporation, late storm tracks

In the September Q&A, even though we think Texas’ hurricane season is in our rear-view mirror, many of the queries we tackle this month are hurricane related. Oh, except for the one about humidity and swimming pool water!

Got questions you’d like us to consider for next month? Reply in the comments below, or use the Contact link on the blog’s home page.


Q, As I get older, and having been through Ike and Beryl in Pearland, I’m becoming much less willing to endure another major storm so close to the coast. If a Cat 4 or 5 were to hit somewhere near Freeport or Galveston, would living somewhere like Magnolia or Katy really offer much more protection than Pearland? After Beryl, we drove to Dallas and saw downed trees all the way through Madisonville, about halfway there.

A. You know, I had similar thoughts as we rode out Beryl in League City. It was an unpleasant experience. (Personal note: I’m very much not a storm chaser. I appreciate the video and images they capture, but I like my storms far away, thank you). I used to think that I would stay in place for a Category 1 or Category 2 hurricane, but with the wildly swaying trees during Beryl, I’m not sure any more.

As for what you’ve asked, there is no question that Magnolia (especially) or Katy would on average be less susceptible to impacts from wind than areas closer to the coast, including Pearland. However, much depends on the strength of the hurricane, the angle at which it strikes the coast, and the speed at which it moves inland. Let’s look at a reasonably good wind gust forecast for Beryl:

Wind gust forecast for Beryl shortly before landfall. (Weather Bell)

This is not exactly what happened, but it’s pretty close, and it is illustrative of what I want to talk about. Specifically, note how important the track, and proximity to the core, is for the strongest winds. Whereas some areas of Galveston County near the water experienced gusts well below that of hurricane force, areas north of Montgomery County, including San Jacinto County, were vulnerable to hurricane force gusts. This is more than 100 miles from the coast.

The bottom line here is that there are a lot of variables. In general, however, the further you live from the coast, the lower the odds that you’ll experience significant wind damage from a hurricane. But that doesn’t mean the odds are zero.

– Eric

Q: (Are) there any historical trends or data to predict a ‘strong’ winter weather (e.g. extremely cold) based upon the low hurricane season activity relevant to Houston? As well as broader US implications? Given our weather patterns are tied together, highs dragging hurricanes and lows pushing them.

A: So the simple answer is no, there is no consistent way to use hurricane season as a gauge for the upcoming winter. We also hear a lot of people say “Well we had a hurricane, so we’re getting snow this winter!” Back in 2021, I wrote a section in our winter outlook, specifically for Houston that showed, historically, a hurricane strike on Houston doesn’t mean anything really and that the odds of snow in a normal winter were pretty much identical to the odds of snow in a post-hurricane winter.

But in a broader sense, a weather company (WDT, which I believe is now part of DTN) published a post a few years back to correlate Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) to winter temps, which found nearly no correlation. The atmosphere is complicated and singular weather events like hurricanes, whether frequent or infrequent are unlikely to have an appreciable impact on an entire season’s worth of weather 3-4 months later.

I will say, there has been some work done to try to quantify this at a hemispheric scale, and there have been some results. A professor at Florida State has done good work on this. So I think there may be something we will eventually be able to gather from all this, but it’s unlikely to be due to one ocean basin’s activity.

– Matt

Q. Love your content. I’m curious, the models you cite [during hurricane coverage] sound like the same ones we’ve been using. Are AI models in development? I wonder if we can dump them all into AI and see what it thinks…

A1. This is the first year that we’ve really begun to use AI models as tools for hurricane forecasting. (If you’re curious how they work, compared to traditional physics-based models, I wrote a longer article here). We’re going to need to get to the end of the hurricane season to know precisely how well they worked. At that point there will be some comprehensive studies done to calculate how well AI-based models handled hurricane tracks in comparison to physics-based models. But my sense is that, for a new product, they’re surprisingly useful. They’re another tool in the arsenal that we look at every day. Matt may have some thoughts about this as well.

– Eric

A2: I will add that specifically for this year’s Gulf storms, the European AI model (the AIFS) has done astoundingly well. It has locked in early on and has tended to front-run the other model guidance in the right direction. In my day to day with it, I have also found it to occasionally have some skill in snuffing out risks to the forecast, such as a cooldown in mid-summer. Perfect? No. Useful? I believe so. The AI suite will get a good test this winter of how reliable they are at picking out cold snaps or snowstorm risks in the Midwest/Northeast. But they are firmly in my toolkit daily now. –

–Matt

Q: This may have an obvious, easy answer but why am I constantly filling up the pool in the hot HUMID summer? I would figure dry air would sop up pool water (moisture) quickly but not so much air already saturated with water.

A: This is an interesting question, and your assumption is correct: More humid air tends to reduce evaporation of water in a pool. So the question then becomes, what’s going on?

One possible reason could be exposure to sun. If it’s in a lot of sun with limited tree coverage, even in high humidity, you’ll still deal with evaporation. Another possible explanation could be the very dry stretch we went through in August. The spigot shut off for an extended time, which probably didn’t help. Beyond those two explanations, there may be something else afoot! Probably something to monitor for pool maintenance folks, just in case!

–Matt

Hurricane Francine as approached the northern Gulf Coast on Sept. 11. (NOAA)

Q. I’ve noticed that many major hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico during September and October tend to impact Louisiana and Florida more than Texas. I’m curious about the reasons behind this pattern. For example, does it have anything to do with the position of the Bermuda High or seasonal changes in weather patterns? Additionally, is it common for hurricanes to stop hitting Texas after mid-September, or are there historical exceptions?

A. I noticed this phenomenon nearly 20 years ago, and did a little research to figure out that after the date of September 24 the historical odds of a hurricane striking the state of Texas are about 1-in-50. So every year, around this date, I write something to the extent that the Texas hurricane season is pretty much over. (Here’s this year’s post). At some point I’ll probably be embarrassingly wrong about this, but generally, if we get to September 24 and things look quiet, it’s a fairly safe bet that we’re done with the threat of hurricanes. And I am talking about hurricanes—the odds of a tropical storm or depression are higher.

There are sound reasons why this is. Generally, as we get toward the end of September, the upper air pattern starts to change as the jet stream begins to move southward. This provides a generally eastward steering flow that we don’t see in August or earlier in September. A good indicator of this is when we start to get our first cool fronts (we’ve already had two this month). The big risk here, of course, is that the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico are still plenty warm in October to support hurricanes, so the threat is there. It’s just that, meteorologically speaking, it’s difficult for these storms to track westward into Texas. That’s not a taunt, mind you.

–Eric

The SCW Q&A: Storming back home; tropical funnels; summer patterns; radar oddities; ‘cane clusters.

Man, will you look at the calendar! August’s almost done with us, but we are not done with it, which means it’s time for our monthly Space City Weather Q&A.

And yeah, we know, there wasn’t an installment in July. We have no excuses, other than to say that July was . . . a little busy.

Anyway, we’re reporting for duty now. On with your questions!

And don’t forget to to feed this beast: Post questions for future Q&A’s in the comments here, or use the Contact link below the blog’s header.


Q. If you were on summer vacation, at what time would you come back if there was something tropical-ish heading for Houston?

A. First, a word on my own plans for summer vacation. I try to never take them in August or September, because that’s the time I’m most concerned about when it comes to tropical weather and Houston. And when I travel in June or July, I definitely bring a laptop.

As for returning in the face of tropical weather, it’s really a difficult question because there are so many variables. Are you returning to prepare your house, only to evacuate again? Are you returning to prepare and hunker down? Are you most concerned about, wind, surge, or inland rainfall? That said, the fundamental question I would want to answer is how long you need to make whatever preparations you want to make before the storm hits. If it is 24 hours, then I would return no fewer than 24 hours before the onset of tropical conditions.

The National Hurricane Center has a useful tool for this you can use during active systems. This product offers a forecast for “earliest reasonable arrival” of tropical storm force winds. (The image below shows the forecast for Beryl, issued on the morning of Saturday July 6, for example). Essentially, this is a good guide to when final preparations for an impending storm should be made. We sometimes publish them on Space City Weather for this very purpose.

–Eric

Example of “earliest reasonable arrival time” of tropical storm winds during Beryl. (National Hurricaen Center)

Q. On Sunday, July 21, in a special weather statement for areas east of Houston, the statement talked about the risk of tropical funnel clouds. What are these and why is there a special weather statement for them vs. a tornado watch?

A. This is a good question. It’s a phenomenon we see frequently in Southeast Texas but not one we really talk a lot about. Tropical funnel clouds form typically when it’s humid and breezy. Why do they form? Funnel clouds form by similar processes both within supercell thunderstorms (which can produce tornadoes) and in these more benign tropical environments. With breezy, humid conditions, you can get a setup with a little bit of wind shear, especially near the coast, where wind direction may change with height. This can lead to some “spin” in the atmosphere, or what we call vorticity. As that vorticity gets stretched out a bit vertically, you get faster spin. And as that happens, you can get a funnel cloud.

So why are these benign? The process by which these funnel clouds form is much slower than the process by which supercell thunderstorms can produce funnel clouds and subsequently tornadoes. Additionally, they usually dissipate after a few minutes. Very few of these funnel clouds ever reach the ground, producing a tornado, and even if they were to do so, the tornado would likely cause minimal, minor damage. So they’re more likely to just get noted as a curiosity more than anything else. Because the process is slow to evolve and quick to dissipate, it doesn’t warrant a watch or warning.

–Matt

Q. My mom says she can remember back 10 or 20 years ago that Houston would normally get thunderstorms every day in the summer. Today it seems like long periods of no rain in the summer is the new normal. Has the weather pattern changed in the past 10 years? Or is it is just a lot drier where we live now (near Addicks Reservoir) than it is over downtown?

A. As best I can tell the patterns of summer rainfall have not really changed all that much in Houston, during the summer, over the last couple of decades. (That’s in contrast to temperatures, which have gone up strikingly, particularly at night). We have always been subject to prolonged periods of summertime high pressure during which there is no rainfall. Sometimes, as in last summer, these highs persist for months on end. This year, the high pressure pattern did not emerge until early August, in which case it hung around until the last week of the month.

Basic schematic for a sea breeze. (NOAA)

In June, July, and August, when we are on the periphery of a high pressure system, Houston summers are like the ones your mom described. This is due to the sea breeze, a pattern in which the land heats up faster than the Gulf of Mexico. This typically happens during the late morning or afternoon hours, and the rising air over land forms clouds a few thousand feet up at the lifting condensation level. This can then lead to the development of showers and thunderstorms. Some summers, particularly the ones your mom remembers, can see this type of pattern persist for weeks.

–Eric

Q. I saw a (radar) effect I can only describe as a rain “splash” or “bubble”. This is a ring of what appears to be very light rain, that starts centered on a newly forming cell and expands in all directions, rather quickly, before eventually dissipating. It appears like a two-dimensional cross section of a bubble inflating, or the expanding wave one might see after tossing a pebble into still water. Are you familiar with this phenomenon?

A. This is good opportunity for us to explain some common features you may see on weather radar that aren’t specifically precipitation. When you look at radar and you see what looks like a bunch of “noise,” as if there’s a bunch of light precipitation, we call this ground clutter.

An example of a radar image with a couple actual showers and a whole lot of ground clutter (birds, bugs, bats, etc.) from this past weekend. (RadarScope)

Ground clutter can literally be anything other than precipitation: Birds, bugs, bats, etc. can all make it up. You see it at every radar site. After awhile, you learn to disregard it. Radar can also pick up wind turbines.

Wind turbines as seen around Corpus Christi. (RadarScope)

These can be a bit of a headache when you look at radar, but again, after awhile they sort of just become background noise to a seasoned user. I noted ground clutter above. How about bat colonies heading out for a night of snacking?

Bat colonies emerging across Central Texas after sunset, while light rain showers work south to north between Houston and San Antonio. (RadarScope)

Similar to bats at sunset, you can see birds emerging from slumber during the morning, a phenomenon that looks like something is literally exploding on radar. These are just enormous flocks of birds taking off for the day from various locations. We call these “roost rings.”

Roost rings on radar from July 17th, as large flocks of birds spread out in all directions after sunrise. (RadarScope)

Then, I think we get to what this reader asked about. If you look at this radar loop from July 17th in the afternoon, you can see numerous showers and thunderstorms over the Houston area generally propagating westward.

Showers and thunderstorms firing up, weakening, and redeveloping to the west from July 17th. (RadarScope)

To the untrained eye, this is a chaotic mess of storminess. But if you look closer, the radar can actually tell you what’s happening here. Let’s zoom into Sugar Land and Greatwood down into Fort Bend County.

Outflow boundaries colliding to produce new thunderstorms southwest of Sugar Land. (RadarScope)

If you look right above and on the right side of what I circled on the loop above, you can see what looks like a “line” of green on the radar. We call these outflow boundaries or gust fronts. When we get thunderstorms, sometimes a cool breeze or cool gust of wind will move in before it starts raining. That’s what we call outflow, and you’re literally feeling the rain-cooled air come in ahead of the rain itself. In this case, outflow from the storms east of Greatwood, closer to Pearland was pushing west. Near Greatwood, it ran into another outflow boundary that was lifting northwest from storms down in Brazoria County. As the two boundaries collided, a new storm formed right over Highway 59/I-69, flared up and then weakened.

Such outflow boundaries are common in our area in summer. Sometimes, you’ll see what looks like outflow lifting north from the Gulf of Mexico. That’s the sea breeze, and once one storm pops on a hot day, it can create an effect of boundary collisions all over the place in erratic fashion. This explains why so often you’ll get a quick inch of rain whereas your neighbor 5 blocks away gets next to nothing. I liken it to atmospheric bumper cars: Pure chaos.

Anyway, now when you look at radar, maybe you’ll be able to detect some cool features too!

-Matt

Q. Do hurricanes come in clusters in certain parts of the Gulf and Atlantic? Several years ago, it seemed like Florida and the lower East Coast were getting slammed over and over. Then for a while the upper Gulf Coast was the big target. Is this faulty memory, or does this actually happen? And is it maybe the Texas coast’s turn?

A. The simple answer is: Yes, that can happen. Look back at 2020 when it seemed as if every storm had its mind set on Louisiana. But we can look back at some other seasons and see this concept in action. Let’s take 1995 for example.

The 1995 hurricane season was active but also highly clustered. (NOAA)

In 1995, there were 19 total storms. Many ended up in the Atlantic, clipping the Caribbean islands or just wandering out to sea. There was a secondary cluster of storms in the Gulf, particularly near the Florida Panhandle. 2010 was another season like that, where we had lots of storms clustered into two distinct areas. The first was out at sea as in 1995. But the second was focused on Central America and Mexico. But then you get seasons like 2017, where anyone and everyone was in play for hits from storms.

The reasons are tough to explain in a simple Q&A, but in general: The weather pattern in summertime can be semi-permanent. In other words, the Bermuda high over the Atlantic can sit in place for weeks at a time. Like we experienced last summer, high pressure can sit over Texas for weeks at a time. When patterns like this happen, it can sort of lead the atmosphere to produce a more common outcome. Those features help steer storms, so when they don’t move, most storms will follow generally similar tracks. Each year is a blank slate, though various climatological cycles can possibly predispose a series of seasons to a more common outcome (see the 1950s on the East Coast of the U.S.).

So does that mean anything for this year? Our weather pattern this summer has been a little more chaotic, though it has firmed up some in the last month, trending more toward stagnant over Texas. That would theoretically put the East Coast or western Atlantic in play, not so much the western Gulf. And we’ve seen Ernesto (Bermuda) and Debby (Florida) do just that. Will that hold through October? No clue truthfully. But it would be nice for us to say Beryl was it for this year.

-Matt

The Space City Weather app now has AccuWeather data and a prettier splash screen

If you’ve been paying attention to what happens on your iPhone, iPad, Mac or Android devices, you know that a new version of our app recently dropped and is in the wild. As is our wont, when the summer comes – and yeah, there’s no denying it IS summer – it’s time for a major update for the Space City Weather app.

Over the past couple of years, we’ve added features that users have asked for most: dark mode, a better tablet/desktop layout, current conditions for more area neighborhoods and cities. This year, we’ve chosen to focus on behind-the-scenes aspects, as we’re pretty happy with app as a whole.

The Space City Weather app, as seen on a Mac that uses Apple Silicon chips, in dark mode. Sweet! (Screenshot)

One of the issues we’ve addressed is the reliability of the data for forecasts and conditions. In past versions, these have come directly from the National Weather Service, which has an Application Programming Interface (API) available for free. But the flow isn’t 100 percent reliable, which is why you may have seen blanks where numbers should be, or in some cases old data.

In the spirit of “you get what you pay for,” we have opened our checkbook and signed a deal with AccuWeather to provide us with current conditions data. We are still relying on the NWS for weather alerts and the detailed forecast discussions that appear when you tap the bell icon at the bottom of any SCW app screen. The NWS also still powers our area radar display.

We’ve also changed the way the app behaves when data for one of the 12 areas we cover is unavailable. The app will pick up the feed for the next nearest reporting station, so you’ll have local data on which to rely.

In addition, we’ve updated the opening screens of the app you see when it launches to better match the nifty new banner on the SCW blog. These so-called splash screens include branding for our sponsor, Reliant. If you’ve got both iOS and Android devices, you may notice these screens look different. That’s due to limitations on newer versions of Android. Regardless, both Space City Weather and its sponsor get to shine when the app fires up.

The new SCW opening splash screen as seen on an iPhone, left, and on newer Android devices. Androids running an operating system older than version 12 display the iOS-style screen. Blame Google.

There are other tweaks and bug fixes. If you have not downloaded the latest app, go grab the newest versions from from the Apple App Store or Google Play.

If you encounter issues, it’s a good idea to uninstall, then reinstall, the latest version. If you’re still in distress, email us at [email protected] and give us as much detail as you can as to what you’re seeing, as well as the version of your device’s operating system, the version of the device and the version of the app (found at the bottom of the Settings screen). A future release of the app will include a bug-report button in settings that will automagically give us these details. Watch for it!

And as always, there are no trackers or ads in the SCW app. It’s pure, sweet weather information, with Eric and Matt’s insightful and easy-to-understand explanations. We’re here for you, wherever you are.

And a big thanks to our developer, Hussain Abbasi, whose hard work and good humor has made the process a breeze.